What world leaders said, and what they focused on at UNGA81 Speeches

What did world leaders actually talk about at the UN this week? With the help of AI, I analyzed 64 UNGA81 speeches from the General Debate’s first two days to find out. This Friday, that replaces our usual Humanitarian Scan.

The words in UNGA81 Speeches

The word clouds show the vocabulary of the debate. Overall it was dominated by security language. The regional clouds tell the more useful story: each region came to New York with a different agenda.

What world leaders talked about at UNGA81

The most used words in 64 General Debate speeches on 22 and 23 September 2026, overall and by region. Hover over a word, or tap it on a phone, to see how often it was used.

Colours show the focus area each word belongs to:

  • UN reform and cooperation
  • Development and economy
  • War and conflict
  • Peace and security
  • International law and justice
  • Climate, energy and oceans
  • Technology and AI
  • Human rights, freedom and democracy
  • Women, children and youth
  • Food, health and education
  • Place names
  • Tone words (no focus area)

Most used: peace (458), security (330), development (262), war (277), Africa (244), conflict (203), cooperation (211), trust (203), future (195), institutions (182). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: all 64 speeches.

Most used: peace (138), war (142), security (140), Russia (127), AI (100), Ukraine (87), principles (86), responsibility (81), rules (77), conflict (73). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: Andorra, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom.

Most used: Africa (191), peace (141), development (85), conflict (69), security (77), trust (69), institutions (70), cooperation (56), reform (48), transformation (58). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: Angola, Botswana, Burundi, DR Congo, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Guinea, Kenya, Libya, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Uganda.

Most used: development (59), peace (58), security (46), energy (50), challenges (40), institutions (36), investment (38), trust (31), future (32), opportunity (28). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United States, Venezuela.

Most used: Israel (42), peace (41), security (33), Palestine (35), region (32), war (26), God (16), Gaza (21), land (15), power (16). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: Iran, Jordan, Qatar, Syria, Türkiye. Only five speeches, so single speakers shape this cloud heavily.

Most used: peace (80), development (61), cooperation (51), war (47), future (31), challenges (36), dialogue (26), security (34), initiative (30), Security Council (32). Ranked by weighted frequency; numbers in brackets are total mentions.

Speeches: Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Palau, Republic of Korea, Timor-Leste, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam.

How this was made: full speech texts from the UN General Debate portal auto-transcripts (UK: official gov.uk transcript). Procedural lines, common English words, courtesy phrases and generic terms (such as “world”, “country”, “people”) were removed, as was each speaker’s own country name. Key phrases such as “international law”, “Security Council” and “food security” are counted as one term, and “in order to” is not counted as “order”. Two clear transcription errors in the Jordan transcript (“Raza” for Gaza, “Rawa” for UNRWA) were corrected. Word size shows mentions per 1,000 words, with each speech weighted equally so long speeches do not dominate. Auto-transcripts can contain errors. Analysis: burakc.com.

  • Peace and security were near the top in every region. “Peace” was the most used word overall (458 mentions, in 62 of 64 speeches), followed by “security“, “war” and “development“. “Trust“, the debate’s theme word, was eighth (203 mentions in 48 speeches).
  • Europe spoke about Russia, war and technology. “Russia” appears 127 times in 18 of the 22 European speeches. “AI” is the fifth most used word in the region, raised in 21 of the 22.
  • Africa spoke about itself and about fairness in the system. “Africa” is the top word (191 mentions in 15 of 16 speeches), followed by peace, development, conflict and trust. “Reform” and “Security Council” rank high, in line with the push for a permanent African seat.
  • The Americas spoke about delivery and the economy. Development, energy, investment, citizens and results rank near the top. “Energy” is the fourth most used word in the region.
  • The Middle East spoke about one conflict. “Israel” is the top word, with Palestine, Gaza and “land” close behind. This group has only five speeches, so single speakers shape it heavily.
  • Asia-Pacific spoke about cooperation and dialogue. Peace, development, cooperation and dialogue lead. “Pacific” stands out, mostly from the small island states.

Three contrasts between regions stand out for development readers:

  • Debt is a Southern topic. Debt was raised in 11 of 16 African speeches (26 mentions) and in only 2 of 22 European speeches (2 mentions).
  • Most countries (46) mention “climate”, few dwell on it, and only the South talks about money. Core climate terms appear 2.6 times per 1,000 words in African speeches and 2.4 in Asia-Pacific, against 0.9 in Europe. Most European leaders mentioned climate (15 of 22), but briefly, and none mentioned climate finance or loss and damage. The leaders who spoke most about climate were those most exposed: Seychelles, Palau, Namibia, Morocco and Dominica. Only Türkiye in total 64 countries mentioned COP31, which it hosts in Antalya this November.
  • AI is a Northern topic. It was raised in 21 of 22 European speeches, but in only 9 of 16 African and 8 of 13 Americas speeches. Not everyone’s priority at the moment, it seems.

The focus areas

Single words can mislead. “Peace” is one big word, but leaders talked about fixing the UN through many mid-sized words: cooperation, trust, institutions, Security Council, reform. The focus view adds these up.

What world leaders focused on at UNGA81

Words from 64 General Debate speeches on 22 and 23 September 2026, grouped into focus areas. Size and percentages show each area’s share of all focus words. Five areas sit close together at 13 to 16% each, followed by a sharp drop to climate, energy and oceans at 7%. Peace, war, law and rights together make up 44%.

Focus areas and the words behind them

Read the top five as a near tie. They are within 3.7 points of each other, and their order depends on how words are grouped. For example, “trust” is counted under UN reform and cooperation; leaving it out would put development and economy first. Hover over or tap any word to see its count.

  1. UN reform and cooperation

    16.4%

    1,455 mentions, raised in 64 of 64 speeches

    • cooperation 211
    • trust 203
    • institutions 182
    • Security Council 140
    • system 140
    • reform 131
    • multilateralism 99
    • partnership 82
    • partners 76
    • collective 55
    • solidarity 54
    • multilateral 49
    • veto 17
    • Pact for the Future 16
  2. Development and economy

    15.6%

    1,397 mentions, raised in 64 of 64 speeches

    • development 262
    • economic 128
    • resources 112
    • investment 94
    • economy 93
    • infrastructure 81
    • developing 71
    • trade 70
    • financial 59
    • supply 57
    • prosperity 56
    • sustainable development 47
    • financing 42
    • growth 41
    • debt 36
    • inequalities 36
    • finance 34
    • SDGs 31
    • poverty 31
    • Global South 13
    • economic security 3
  3. War and conflict

    13.5%

    1,218 mentions, raised in 64 of 64 speeches

    • war 277
    • conflict 203
    • threat 96
    • force 83
    • borders 72
    • attacks 63
    • military 62
    • aggression 61
    • violence 55
    • territory 54
    • weapons 41
    • nuclear 39
    • terrorism 29
    • nuclear weapons 25
    • terrorist 25
    • occupation 22
    • disarmament 11
  4. Peace and security

    13.4%

    1,200 mentions, raised in 64 of 64 speeches

    • peace 458
    • security 330
    • dialogue 127
    • stability 87
    • peaceful 66
    • diplomacy 56
    • negotiations 32
    • peacekeeping 19
    • mediation 15
    • ceasefire 10
  5. International law and justice

    12.7%

    1,120 mentions, raised in 64 of 64 speeches

    • principles 173
    • international law 152
    • rules 121
    • order 109
    • sovereignty 105
    • resolution 87
    • UN Charter 86
    • law 84
    • justice 81
    • accountability 31
    • rule of law 26
    • genocide 25
    • humanitarian law 12
    • impunity 11
    • war crimes 9
    • crimes against humanity 8
  6. Climate, energy and oceans

    7.0%

    626 mentions, raised in 61 of 64 speeches

    • energy 155
    • climate 92
    • resilience 74
    • climate change 69
    • sea 59
    • ocean 44
    • freedom of navigation 23
    • Hormuz 23
    • maritime 20
    • renewable 19
    • small island states 18
    • energy security 12
    • maritime security 8
    • climate finance 6
    • loss and damage 4
  7. Technology and AI

    4.6%

    409 mentions, raised in 55 of 64 speeches

    • AI 169
    • technology 131
    • digital 46
    • innovation 38
    • disinformation 9
    • cyber 6
    • cybersecurity 5
    • data 5
  8. Human rights, freedom and democracy

    4.5%

    397 mentions, raised in 61 of 64 speeches

    • human rights 91
    • freedom 86
    • rights 68
    • human dignity 43
    • democratic 38
    • dignity 36
    • democracy 35
  9. Women, children and youth

    4.2%

    402 mentions, raised in 61 of 64 speeches

    • children 122
    • generations 95
    • young 72
    • women 68
    • youth 33
    • gender 12
  10. Food, health and education

    3.9%

    350 mentions, raised in 59 of 64 speeches

    • education 81
    • health 71
    • water 64
    • food 60
    • food security 33
    • agriculture 22
    • pandemic 13
    • water security 6
  11. Humanitarian crises and displacement

    2.3%

    219 mentions, raised in 52 of 64 speeches

    • civilians 61
    • humanitarian 58
    • migration 29
    • humanitarian aid 19
    • displacement 17
    • displaced 12
    • refugees 10
    • hunger 10
    • UNRWA 3
  12. Crime and trafficking

    1.7%

    137 mentions, raised in 34 of 64 speeches

    • crimes 38
    • criminal 35
    • organised crime 22
    • trafficking 17
    • drug 15
    • corruption 5
    • cybercrime 3
    • transnational crime 2

Crisis-related places named most often

Countries and places linked to current conflicts and crises, counted separately from the focus areas above. Palestine includes mentions of Gaza and the West Bank; a speech mentioning more than one is counted once in the speech total. Each leader’s own country is not counted, so Ukraine’s and Iran’s own speeches do not add to their totals.

  1. PalestinePalestine 86, Gaza 55, West Bank 18159 in 32 speeches
  2. Russia141 in 25 speeches
  3. Ukraine107 in 29 speeches
  4. Israel81 in 24 speeches
  5. Middle East47 in 27 speeches
  6. Iran44 in 17 speeches
  7. Sudan31 in 24 speeches
  8. Haiti21 in 8 speeches
  9. Lebanon20 in 9 speeches
  10. Syria17 in 8 speeches
  11. Venezuela8 in 3 speeches
  12. Yemen6 in 5 speeches
  13. Congo6 in 6 speeches

How this was made: full speech texts from the UN General Debate portal auto-transcripts (UK: official gov.uk transcript), cleaned of procedural lines, common English words and courtesy phrases. Phrases such as “international law”, “food security” and “war crimes” are counted as one term so they land in the right area, and “in order to” is not counted as “order”. Two clear transcription errors in the Jordan transcript (“Raza” for Gaza, “Rawa” for UNRWA) were corrected. Related words were grouped into focus areas; the words counted in each area are listed under it. Shares use mentions per 1,000 words with each speech weighted equally, so long speeches do not dominate. Words about tone rather than topic (for example future, responsibility, challenges, region, power, opportunity, transformation, respect) are not assigned to any area. Auto-transcripts can contain errors. Analysis: burakc.com.

  • Five areas share the lead, at 13 to 16% each. They are UN reform and cooperation (16.4%), Development and economy (15.6%), War and conflict (13.5%), Peace and security (13.4%), and International law and justice (12.7%). They are 3.7 points apart, and their order depends on grouping choices, so treat them as a near tie.
  • Leaders spent as much time on the machinery as on war. Peace, war, law and rights together make up 44% of focus words. UN reform and development alone make up another 32%. The debate was as much about how the system works as about specific conflicts.
  • After the top five, there is a sharp drop. Climate, energy and oceans comes next at 7.0%. Everything else is under 5%.
  • The people-centred areas are small. Human rights, freedom and democracy is 4.5%. Women, children and youth is 4.2%. Food, health and education is 3.9%.
  • Humanitarian issues are mentioned, but only in passing. Humanitarian crises and displacement is 2.3% of focus words. 52 of 64 leaders touched on it, but briefly. The word “humanitarian” appears 58 times in total, against 169 for “AI” and 203 for “trust”. “Migration” appears 29 times, in 14 speeches.
  • Crime is a regional concern. Crime and trafficking is the smallest area (1.7%), raised in 34 speeches, mostly from the Americas.

Attention to named crises is not unexpected:

  • Palestine was named most often. Together with Gaza and the West Bank, it was named 159 times in 32 speeches, half of all speeches.
  • Russia and Ukraine came next. Russia was named 141 times in 25 speeches, Ukraine 107 times in 29.
  • Several other major crises got passing references.
    • Sudan was named in 24 speeches, but only 31 times: one line per speech on average.Haiti was named 21 times, in 8 speeches.
    • Yemen was named in 5 speeches and the DRC in 6.

What does this mean for humanitarian and development work?

This is my reading of the data, not a finding.

  • Leaders talked about fixing the system more than about any single crisis. “UN reform and cooperation” is the largest focus area (16.4%), just ahead of development, war, peace and law. Words like cooperation, trust, institutions, Security Council and reform run through almost every speech.
    • The shared message was that the system is not working. The disagreement was about who should fix it, and how.
      • My take: Pooled funds, anticipatory action and local partners are good examples as each is both a response to needs and a way to make the system work better.
    • Africa asked for a permanent African seat on the Security Council, debt relief, and climate money. They want the system reformed before they trust it.
    • The United States and Argentina focused on sovereignty and criticized the UN’s reach.
  • There is no shared agenda on debt and climate. African, Pacific and Caribbean leaders put debt and climate near the centre. European leaders barely mentioned debt and mentioned climate only briefly. We cannot say that leaders do not pay attention to the climate at all, but conflicts seem overshadowing natural ones.
  • Attention follows geopolitics. Ukraine was in Europe’s radar as it is also a security issue. However, Gaza is no longer a conflict anyone can look away from. Still, Sudan, Haiti and Yemen named very less then these two conflicts.
  • Humanitarian needs were mentioned, not discussed. Most leaders (52 of 64) touched on them, but only briefly: 2.3% of focus words. “Humanitarian” appears 58 times in all speeches; “AI” appears 169 times.
  • AI is becoming a governance topic, mostly for the North. If AI governance is designed mainly by the countries that talk about it, the Global South may again have to follow rules made by others.

What is your take from the UNGA81 speeches?

The analysis here is based on word counts and focus areas that I defined myself. It shows what leaders stressed, but it cannot capture the full sense of each speech. So what do you think the world leaders wanted to pass in New York?

How was the approach?

On 22 and 23 September 2026, many heads of state and government spoke at the opening of the 81st UN General Assembly. Similar to most of us, I was not able to follow each speech throughout the two days. However, I was able to reach 64 speeches in total at UN’s official site, and used AI-auto-generated texts provided by the UN (e.g., https://gadebate.un.org/en/81/jordan). I manually downloaded all speeches one by one. There are some speeches not available for download, such as Israel, at the time I gathered all speeches. I used AI to analyze the full texts of all 64 speeches in two ways:

  • Word clouds: I wanted to specifically use “word clouds” to see which words leaders repeated most, overall and by region. You may notice that Türkiye is under Middle East rather than Europe. I made the decision here, otherwise the Middle East group would have had only four speeches.
  • Focus areas: Not to get lost in an ocean of words, I thought that grouping related words into twelve topics would give a broader understanding to show where leaders actually spent their speaking time.

Both approaches use the same cleaned transcripts and the same counting rule: mentions per 1,000 words, with each speech weighted equally, so a long speech does not outweigh a short one. They answer different questions, and read together they tell a clearer story. How does the weighting work? Let’s take the word “peace”:

  • In Trump’s speech: it appears 10 times in 5,202 words, which is 1.9 times per 1,000 words.
  • In Rwanda’s speech: it appears 2 times in 661 words, which is 3.0 times per 1,000 words.

A raw count says the US speech used “peace” five times more. Relative to length, Rwanda’s speech gave it more emphasis. Each speech’s rate is calculated this way, and the rates are averaged, so that all 64 speeches have the same weight. Word sizes and focus-area percentages use these averaged rates. The mention and speech counts shown next to each word are plain totals, so the percentages can’t be recalculated from them directly. Does it make sense?

How to read this?
  • Source: the UN General Debate portal’s auto-generated transcripts. The UK text is the official gov.uk transcript. Auto-transcripts can contain errors; two clear errors in key names were corrected.
  • Missing speeches: Some speeches were not available or not made when I accessed such as Israel, Nauru, Tanzania, Bhutan, Paraguay, Central African Republic and Serbia are not in the data.
  • What was removed: procedural lines, courtesy phrases, common English words and each leader’s own country name.
  • Phrases kept together: “international law”, “food security” and “war crimes” are each counted as one term.
  • Grouping is a judgement: every word counted in each focus area is listed with its count on the focus-area page, so readers can check or question any grouping.
  • Word counts measure emphasis, not policy: a word used often is a sign of what a leader chose to stress, not proof of what their government will do.
In case you missed the previous Friday Humanitarian Scan posts here they are:

Leave a Comment

Share your thoughts